Olivia Gadecki vs Elsa Jacquemot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performance in second serve statistics, Jacquemot has demonstrated a 41.52% success rate in winning points on their second serve, whereas Gadecki has achieved a slightly lower rate of 38.45%. This difference can play a significant role in predicting match outcomes, as a player's efficiency in this area is often correlated with overall match success. When it comes to return games, Jacquemot has won 53.24% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form, while Gadecki has managed to claim 50% of these points. However, Gadecki holds an edge on first serve returns with a percentage of 32.17% compared to Jacquemot's 28.94%.

Examining their respective performances under pressure, Jacquemot has shown the ability to save 48.48% of breakpoints, marginally surpassing Gadecki's rate of 47.85%. Both players convert break points at a similar rate, with Jacquemot converting 35.86% and Gadecki at 35.61%, indicating a closely contested battle should opportunities to break serve arise. These metrics are useful for live betting enthusiasts as they can influence in-game predictions.

Looking at overall performance over the past year, Jacquemot has won 53.09% of their matches (43 wins and 38 losses), whereas Gadecki has a slightly better success rate of 58.73%, with 37 wins against 26 losses. The playing surface is also a considerable factor; Jacquemot thrives on Indoor Hard courts, boasting a win rate of 58%, while Grass has proven challenging with a 46% win rate. Conversely, Gadecki performs best on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, although struggle is evident on Indoor Hard surfaces at 36%.

The two players have participated in similarly competitive levels, primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K. Gadecki, however, has a higher winning percentage, claiming victory in 73.08% of these matches compared to Jacquemot's 59.02%. This demonstrates Gadecki's consistent ability to outperform at this level. Analyzing opponent quality, Jacquemot's recent opponents have held an average rank of 199.26, whereas Gadecki's opponents have averaged a rank of 202.63, showcasing similar levels of competition.

In deciding sets, which can be crucial for match outcomes, Gadecki exhibits a notable advantage by winning 65% of these tense situations compared to Jacquemot's 37%. While current event statistics could further influence predictions, based on the analyzed data, Gadecki seems to have the edge heading into this match. Despite Jacquemot's competitive strengths, Gadecki's superior percentages in key match situations suggest they will likely triumph.